The Effect of Online Debate Activities on Critical Thinking and English Speaking Skills
Kata Kunci:
Online debate, speaking skills, EFL learners, critical thinking, language learningAbstrak
This study examines the impact of online debate activities on the speaking skills and critical thinking abilities of EFL students. A quasi-experimental design was employed involving two groups: an experimental group (n = 15) that participated in online debates and a control group (n = 15) that engaged in conventional discussions. Speaking skills were assessed using CEFR-based rubrics, while critical thinking was measured using a standardized test. Quantitative findings revealed that the experimental group’s speaking scores improved significantly from a pre-test average of 5.75 to a post-test average of 7.50 (mean gain = +1.75; t = -41.413; p = 0.000), while the control group showed only a modest improvement from 5.52 to 6.00 (mean gain = +0.43; t = -9.539; p = 0.000). An independent t-test confirmed a significant difference in gain scores between groups (t = -8.607; p = 0.000). Qualitative data supported these results, with students reporting increased confidence, engagement, and critical thinking. Despite initial challenges such as anxiety and technical issues, students adapted well. The study concludes that online debate is an effective pedagogical strategy for enhancing speaking performance and cognitive engagement in EFL settings.
Referensi
Aarar, M. A. M. (2024). The impact of debate discussion via zoom platform on enhancing secondary students’ critical thinking and English argumentative writing skills [Universidad de Granada]. https://hdl.handle.net/10481/89452
Agung, A. S. N., & Surtikanti, M. W. (2020). Students’ Perception of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study on the English Students of STKIP Pamane Talino. SOSHUM : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v10i2.1316
Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
Arif, R. N. H. (2024). Assessment of Critical Thinking Ability in Science Learning Using Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA). ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum2599
Ball, S. J. (2021). The Education Debate. Policy Press.
Bigs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Brown, B., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language Assessment.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (2018). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguictics, 1(1), 1–47. http://www.uefap.com/tefsp/bibliog/canale_swain.pdf
Chen, B., Chen, B., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.002
Foxworthy, A. W., & McCarter, W. (2025). Uncovering the Treasure of Self-Directed Learning. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 28(1).
Gulnaz, F. (2020). Fostering Saudi EFL learners’ communicative, collaborative and critical thinking skills through the technique of in-class debate. International Journal of English Linguistic, 10(5), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n5p265
Hattani, H. A. (2021). Communicative language teaching in support of critical thinking: the role of in-Class Debate. Revue Linguistique Et Référentiels Interculturels, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/liri-v2i1.27504
Jin, S. (2023). Speaking proficiency and affective effects in EFL: Vlogging as a social media-integrated activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13381
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (2020). Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and Development: A Vygotskian Framework. Educational Psycologist, 31(3–4), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266
Jones, S., & Flint, A. (2022). Digital Platforms and the Democratization of Creative Writing: Exploring New Literacies and Online Communities. Journal of New Literacies, 15(2), 45–60.
Krashen, S. . (2018). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Kvale, S. (2021). Doing Interviews. Sage Publications.
Lasso Rosero, K. M. (2019). Rubrics as Tools for Speaking Assessment [Universidad de Nariño]. http://sired.udenar.edu.co/id/eprint/15443
Moorhouse, B. L., & Wong, K. M. (2022). Blending asynchronous and synchronous digital technologies and instructional approaches to facilitate remote learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 9, 51–70. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40692-021-00195-8
Namaziandost, E., Nasri, M., & Estafahani, F. R. (2019). Pedagogical Efficacy of Experience-Based Learning (EBL) Strategies for Improving the Speaking Fluency of Upper-intermediate Male and Female Iranian EFL Students. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 4(2), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2925/ijree.4.2.29
Novak, E., McDaniel, K., & Li, J. (2023). Factors that impact student frustration in digital learning environments. Computers and Education Open, 5(October), 100153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100153
Noviyenty, L. (2018). Strategies in learning and techniques in teaching english speaking. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of ….
Patton, M. . (2020). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Robinson, J. (2024). Likert scale. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 3917–3918. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1654
Sari, A., Jaya, A., Hermansyah, H., & Mortini, A. V. (2022). Using Mixidea Online Debating Strategy To Promote the Students’ Speaking Ability. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 5(2), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8591
Suárez-Perales, I., Valero-Gil, J., Leyva-de la Hiz, D. I., Rivera-Torres, P., & Garcés-Ayerbe, C. (2021). Educating for the future: How higher education in environmental management affects pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128972
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan) (A. Nuryanto (ed.); Kedua). ALFABETA, CV.
Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Struckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2019). 21st century learning skills: Learning for life in our time. Wiley Publisher.
Wahyuni, S., Mujiyanto, J., Rukmini, D., & Fitriati, S. W. (2019). Examining Teachers’ Innovation in EFL Classrooms in Promoting Students’ Autonomous Learning. International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation, 188, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.64
Wu, K. (2018). The Relationship between Language Learners’ Anxiety and Learning Strategy in the CLT Classrooms. International Education Studies, 3(1), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n1p174
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Andika, Maria Angelica Reyes, Lorenzo Miguel Bautista (Author)

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




